US di Ambang Kerisauan

O

Realitinya US memang tak takut dengan Malaysia, tapi depa takut dengan China. So apa hubungannya dengan Malaysia? Kenapa US tiba2 U-turn sokong kerajaan BN walhal pada 2008 kerajaan US menyokong kerajaan PR?? Simple, baca dulu artikel ini dari bekas setiausaha keselamatan US iaitu Henry Kissinger utk pemahaman di mana US sekarang mesti menghindari perang dingin antara China -US.

‎Kita sedia maklum, US dalam kesusahan dari segi ekonomi dan pada masa yang sama, pesaing utama US iaitu China dan Russia telah meningkat berkuasa dari segi ketenteraan dan ekonomi dan pengaruh mereka. Dan pada masa yang sama jugak, sentimen ANTI US dari kerajaan negara2 membangun cukup tinggi. Jika berlaku perang dingin antara US-China, negara2 membangun salah satunya Malaysia kemungkinan besar akan menyokong China. Ini cukup memeningkan kepala US.

Dari penulisan Henry Kissinger iaitu Avoiding US - China Coldwar menegaskan risiko besar kepada US jika berlaku perang dingin ini dimana negara2 lain terutamanya negara membangun mula memilih pihak untuk disokong. Memandangkan US dalam kesusahan (duit takde) dan sentimen anti US yang cukup tinggi, kemungkinan besar negara2 lain akan menyokong seteru US iaitu China memandangkan China jauh lebih kaya iaitu lebih baik dari segi hubungan ekonomi termasuklah impak sentimen Anti US yang makin menebal. Sebahagian dari penulisan Henry Kissinger ;

"A Cold War between them would bring about an international choosing of sides, spreading disputes into internal politics of every region at a time when issues such as nuclear proliferation, the environment, energy and climate require a comprehensive global solution."

‎Ok kita kembali ke Malaysia. Jikalau US asyik dok hentam kerajaan BN Malaysia dan terus menyokong proksi mereka iaitu Anwar Ibrahim, dan jika berlakunya Perang Dingin antara China dan US, korang rasa mana kerajaan BN akan sokong? Sendiri mau ingatla. Jikalau kerajaan BN menyokong China, US akan kehilangan pengaruh mereka di Selat Melaka dimana ia adalah organ penting dalam perdagangan antarabangsa. Dan ini akan beri kesan yang cukup negatif terhadap ekonomi US yang makin teruk.

‎Dan jika proksi mereka Anwar Ibrahim asyik dok kantoi je memanjang, berapa lama US nak tunggu kerajaan baru PR yang very friendly terhadap US akan ditubuhkan? Maka US terpaksa juga memikirkan survival mereka juga maklumlah dengan mengambil kira risiko berlakunya Perang Dingin antara Blok China dan Blok US. Maka kaw timlah dengan kerajaan Malaysia supaya "balancekan" pengaruh China yang makin menebal dikalangan pemimpin utama Malaysia iaitu PM kita. Itulah sebab pada 2008, kerajaan US kata Malaysia korup, tiba-tiba 2011 US kata Kerajaan Malaysia negara Islam termaju hehehehe. Itulah dia Presiden US sudah U-Turn. Itulah dia faktanya, very simple...

Dan ada ura-ura kerajaan2 di Asia Tenggara khususnya Malaysia berpakat dengan China utk menjual kesemua reserve USD didalam pembendeharaan mereka sebagai satu rancangan utk menyokong China memberi ugutan ekonomi terhadap US. Tapi ini hanyalah khabar angin. Artikel pada April 2011 ini menunjukkan China merancang utk menjual kesemua reserve USD dalam perbendaharaan mereka. Dan China telah merancang pakatan ni semenjak 2007...

‎Dari perkara di atas, ini pula artikel China yang memulakan satu pakatan besar-besaran sebagai satu ugutan ekonomi terhadap US dengan menjual kesemua USD reserve dalam bendaharaan mereka. Khabar Angin mengatakan Malaysia pun mahu terlibat jugak, maklumlah US asyik dok mengusik kerajaan BN dengan sokong Anwar je memanjang..

‎Akhir kata, US dah buat macam2 di Malaysia, sokong proksi mereka Anwar dari dalam dan luar dari segi media antarabangsa, menyokong dan membiayai BERSIH dan mcm2, tapi tak jatuh2 gak kerajaan BN. Masa dan modal sudah banyak dihabiskan kepada Anwar, asyik rugi je. Dan pada masa yang sama, seteru US iaitu China sedang mengorak langkah memperluaskan pengaruh mereka dengan pantas. So ape lagi pilihan utk US?

Option 1: Adakah untuk survival iaitu dengan menyekat pengaruh China di Malaysia, atau

Option 2 : Terus habiskan masa dan modal untuk sokong Proksi mereka iaitu Anwar yang asyik dok kantoi???

Nampak gaya pada 2011, Presiden US memilih Option 1. Hehehe. Padan muka Anwar.

 ‎

Realitinya, US memang tak peduli pun pasal integriti, demokrasi seperti yang dicanangkan, apa yang mereka peduli adalah kepentingan strategik mereka. Itu pasalla U-Turn balik pada kerajaan BN di Malaysia. Inilah kesan kepada sesiapa yang mengadap sangat nak jadi proksi US seperti Anwar Ibrahim.

Anwar Ibrahim kena ambil pedoman daripada kenyataan BBC Radio -

"America Doesnt Have Friends... Just Interests.".

Facts About DEB : For Malaysian to DIGEST

These are the FACTS for u guys to digest and use it to defend DEB against DAP false allegations. THESE ARE THE BLOCKBUSTER FACTS THAT I USED AGAINST DAP SUPPORTERS AND ALL OF THEM CORNERED. Check paragraph 33, under the results of NEP between 1970 and 1990. Results that showed the Bumis wealth increased from 2% to 20%, and the non-bumis have INCREASED TOO from 34.6% to 54.6%!!!! And foreigners reduced from 63.4% to 25.1%.

Conclusion, DEB benefitted the non-bumis too tremendously!!

From these Facts, shows that DAP are LYING to Chinese supporters especially to create hatred towards the Malays by spinning the DEB. But rest assured u guys now have these facts as your arsenal to these DAP losers...

READ THIS ARTICLE

And one more thing, do u guys even know who is the "Financial Architect" of DEB? It was a chinese guy, his name is Tun Tan Siew Sin. He is the longest finance minister and part of the team. Tun Razak created the concept, Tun Tan Siew put in some financial ingredient to make it work. Remember the biggest spender during that moment (60s-70s) were the Brits and foreigners, and Malaysians (Malays+Chinese) were poor. And even worse those big foreign spenders ain't spending their money to Chinese businessmen cause they dont trust the Chinese cause during that time was communists ideology run rampant. So how to solve this? Just make the Malays rich because they are the majority and they will end up spend their money on Chinese businessmen at the end of the day. At the end it is a win-win situation, Malays got their money and Chinese benefits from the Malays spending power thru DEB. It is very Simple mathematics. U guys can tell this to your Chinese friends, almost all of them forgotten Tun Tan Siew Sin Services to this country..


One more thing the mistakes Malaysian misrepresenting the true meaning of DEB. DEB is not JUST about the rights Malays or Bumis. It is simple Mathematics to restructure back the economy by creating new anchor spending power and replacing the traditional British / foreign spending power in this country. And why Malays and Bumis were chosen? Simple, because they are the MAJORITY!!! That means spending power by volumes!! Tunku Abdul Rahman have clearly stated that about article 153. It is clear,

The DEB policy is basically originated from Reid Commision (Bunch of White Boys) in addressing ECONOMIC INBALANCE, so what it means? It means simple economic mathematics!!!! Read this ;

"Although the Bumiputra have always been the largest racial segment of the Malaysian population (about 65%), their economic position has also tended to be precarious. As late as 1970, 13 years after the drafting of the constitution, they controlled only 4% of the economy, with much of the rest being held by Chinese and foreign interests. As a result, the Reid Commission had recommended the drafting of Article 153 to address this economic imbalance..."

 I give u guys a tip on how to argue with DAP morons regarding this DEB. Start with this question " If 65% Bumis dont have the spending power, what will happen to Chinese businessmen?" Start with that question, lets see those stupid DAP people answer it. They will get cornered. And then u guys put all the team names that makes DEB works, not just Tun Razak and presto, part of the team are Chinese too (Remember Tun Tan Siew Sin?). And see what these losers DAP will answer, and as usual again they cornered. THATS HOW U ARGUE WITH DAP SUPPORTERS!!! with FACTS!!, not just mum

Another tip to UMNO supporters here - Read a book about Malaysia ECONOMIC HISTORY especially how this country begin their economic adventurebo jumbo saying we got rights la, whatever la.

s since 1957 till today. Especially Who is holding the spending power? What is our import export? What is our policy as per time frame? And then How we correct the imperfections to make it work and stable till today? Read this economic history, UMNO supporters will eat DAP supporters for lunch.

 For long term measures that UMNO seriously need to consider - Is putting the Facts of our Economic History in our History Syllabus. Not JUST focusing on physical histories like biographies of heroes and events. From these Economic History, all races will be able learn the economical strength of each races in this country and how important for them to work together and share their respective perks and skills and then they will understand what is DEB is all about and from there can forge a real 1Malaysia spirit. It is high time to bring in our Economic Historian in the History Books. People need to know what is DEB means in economic terms, why is 1997 capital measures so important on that time. This UMNO need to take into consideration..

To me, DEB still is a spectacular ideas from brilliant bunch of people. And even the implementation have it flaws, since the idea is so good, it still works and brought results. The only issues are at the middle tier management of UMNO which tainting the implementation part. We can compare the realities of DEB in Singapore. As to date, the spending power of Singapore are not held by their own citizens but by minority 1 million foreigners such as Americans, Europe etc. So what happen, when the foreigners were hit with economic downturn recently, those foreigners cut down their spending tremendously so at the end it gave the high impact to the citizens of Singapore since they are so dependent on foreigners spending power. Singapore were far more worst situation than Malaysia in 2008 economic downturn.