Monday, 27 August 2012

Entri Khas Merdeka : Persamaan DAP dan Komunis




SIAPA KATA BRITISH MENANG SENDIRI LAWAN KOMUNIS???? 

Gerald Templer dihantar pulang ke Britain sebab apa? Sebab makan angin? TAK! Sebab British kalah lawan dengan PKM. So macamana British boleh menang second round dengan PKM? Ya! Sebab kebangkitan seluruh rakyat Malaya menentang Komunis. PKM kalah sebab BERSATUNYA rakyat Malaya menentang komunis.




 Sebab2 British kalah ;

-       Selepas WW2, British jatuh bankrup dan tidak cukup askar, peralatan dan sumber,
-       British tiada pengalaman berperang di hutan,
-       British tidak tahu berbahasa Cina untuk pecah kod2 rahsia komunis. 

Selepas rakyat bangkit sebab marah dengan kekejaman komunis, British boleh relax dan ambil peranan supporting role je. Dengan melepaskan kemarahan rakyat kepada komunis seolah-olah seperti TSUNAMI MELANGGAR ACHEH. Terduduk terus Chin Peng/PKM.


British dapat upgrade team2 risikan depa untuk menentang komunis. Di sini kita kena berterima kasih dengan saudara kita berbangsa Cina. Apa motivasi bangsa Cina untuk menentang komunis? Sebenarnya, kadar kematian bangsa Cina adalah lebih ramai dari bangsa Melayu, sebab bangsa Cina ni tidak merekod kadar kematian mereka. Macam kes along sekarang ni, bangsa Cina jarang report polis bila along memeras ugut mereka. PKM telah pergi ke kampung2 keluarga Cina untuk memaksa orang2 Cina ni meminta anak2 mereka menyertai komunis. PKM juga akan merampas harta dan makanan. Jika tidak diberi, mereka akan dibunuh. Selalunya PKM akan membunuh dengan brutal orang Cina di khalayak orang Cina lain untuk menakutkan mereka. Dengan bantuan bangsa Cina, tentera rejimen Melayu telah mempunyai "James Bond" mereka sendiri yang menjalankan tugas2 bahaya seperti "deep cover" iaitu dengan memberikan maklumat strategik “Strike Point” kepada tentera rejimen Melayu yang nak tibai komunis. YA! Bangsa Melayu tidak berseorangan dalam menentang komunis. 


British juga dapat upgrade kebolehan berperang dalam hutan. Puak2 Mat Saleh ni pening kepala bila berlawan dalam hutan. Sebab itulah PKM "sayur" mereka. Tapi nasib baik British dapat upgrade iaitu dengan kemasukan bangsa Melayu, India dan orang asli. Apa yang memotivasikan bangsa Melayu untuk bangkit menentang/membunuh komunis ialah apabila bermulanya komunis membunuh seorang budak Melayu berumur 10 tahun di Pahang dengan tanpa sebab. Motivasi bangsa India pulak apabila PKM mengebom estet-estet kepunyaan British yang membunuh kebanyakannya adalah pekerja India. Motivasi orang asli pulak sebab mereka dipaksa untuk bekerjasama dengan komunis di hutan, jika mereka tidak mahu akan dibunuh. Inilah motivasi kaum2 ini mengangkat senjata untuk membunuh komunis. 


 Saya faham kenapa bangsa Melayu majoritinya nampak isu keganasan PKM ni macam Cina vs Melayu. Ini adalah kerana apa yang mereka nampak depan mata itu je. Dalam menangani keganasan PKM ni ada dua set serangan. Pertama ialah konsep "Broad Sword" iaitu serangan utama dan kedua "Cloak and Dagger" iaitu kerja2 ala James Bond. Bagi bangsa Melayu, kelebihan mereka ialah di hutan, jadi masuk team "Broad Sword" sebagai serangan utama. Bangsa Cina pula sebab bahasa dan pemikiran sama dengan Cina komunis, jadi mereka masuk team "Cloak and Dagger" untuk buat kerja2 ala James Bond (Ada Melayu yang jadi James Bond tapi tak ramaila). Oleh kerana ada dua team berbeza, majoriti orang Melayu tak nampak team2 belah bangsa Cina, maklumlah James Bond … hehe. Tapi orangg2 atasan rejimen Melayu nampakla sebab diorang communicate untuk rancang peperangan. Secara amnya, dua team ni bekerjasama dengan rapat. Intel Jitu + Kekuatan Serangan utama = PKM bungkus. Itulah realiti dan resultnya.


Kesimpulannya, kemenangan menentang komunis ; 

Deep Cover Risikan yang mantap (majoriti bangsa Cina) + Keberanian dan efektif Ground Forces di hutan (Bangsa Melayu, India, Orang Asli dan lain2) + Bersatunya rakyat Malaya. 





Inilah equation yang menyebabkan PKM tewas. Sebab itulah taktik DAP untuk menang, mereka kena pecahbelahkan dulu semua bangsa bermula dengan bangsa Cina dengan bangsa Melayu, kemudian barulah bangsa Melayu dengan bangsa Melayu. Taktik DAP sama dengan PKM cuma mereka tak angkat senjata je.


Kekejaman PKMlah yang menjadi motivasi utama kaum2 di Malaya bersatu dan bangkit menentang PKM. Ianya bukanlah propaganda British atau alat2 British. Ketika insurgeni (kebangkitan) inilah kaum2 di Malaya bersatu hati menentang kekejaman PKM. Bangsa Cina menganggotai intelligence untuk memecah kod bahasa Cina komunis dan pemikiran mereka. Bangsa Melayu, India, Orang Asli dan lain2 dengan keberanian mereka berperang dengan PKM.

Thursday, 23 August 2012

"Jaguh Kampung" by Tun Daim Zainuddin

Taken from www.merboktimes.blogspot.com





by Tun Daim Zainuddin

Since my second retirement in 2001, I have accepted only one invitation to speak in Malaysia and that was in 2004.

So to accept this invitation, it took some serious thinking on my part. I have spoken many times overseas but at home I think people may be tired of hearing me talk all the time so as a retiree I should just keep quiet!

“I accepted this invitation because I have great faith in our young people. For us as a nation to grow and succeed in the future we need good leaders and you here are our leaders of tomorrow.

So, thank you Tengku Zafrul Aziz for inviting me. The topic you chose is interesting – Jaguh Kampung, A Personal Perspective on Business Outside Malaysian Shores.

Nowadays, the term Jaguh Kampung seems to suggest our failures. It dismisses our achievements and local successes. It portrays us as a failure overseas. It looks down upon us. It used to refer to sports, now it encompasses business.

I do not see anything derogatory about being a Jaguh Kampung, for how can you succeed globally if you have not achieved success even at home. It is here that you hone your skills, know of your strengths and weakness, make your mistakes and learn from them; it is here that you plant the seed of your success overseas. It is only negative when you are successful at home yet not able to translate the same success abroad. Why?

It has been argued that Malaysians are far too comfortable at home and therefore cannot stand the competition outside. For the Malays particularly it is said that we do not have the history of migrants who came in junks and sampans to make a new life in a new land; that we have no history of doing business and that there is no NEP overseas.

I don’t subscribe to such an argument. Many non-Malays fail too. Many non-Malays who have succeeded here with Government help have failed overseas. It has nothing to do with race and everything to do with ourselves. We have to see our own strengths and weakness to know why we succeed and why we fail. I have no sociological or anthropological thesis on this but I can tell you of my personal experience to illustrate, if that is of any help.

So, I guess I shall start from the beginning. I come from a small place called Lorong Kampong Padang in Kota Tanah, Seberang Perak, Kedah. Growing up I was confused, we had no padang, no kota (fort), no perak (silver)! It was a small kampong where everyone knew everyone. Yet this village produced 3 doctors, 2 veterinary surgeons, a dentist and may top civil servants. As far as I knew, they were no lawyers, yet my father kept urging me “Grow up to be a lawyer”.

Two of the three doctors were Dr Mahathir who married another doctor, and Dr Bakar who married Tan Sri Dr Salmah, the first female Malay doctor in the country. Amongst my schoolmates and seniors were Tan Sri Hanafiah Ahmad of Tabung Haji, Tan Sri Hanafiah Hussein, the first Malay Chartered Accountant, and Tan Sri Bakar Hamid, Head of Income tax. The list goes on.

The late Tun Zahir (Speaker of Parliament) helped me with my admission to Lincoln’s Inn. In London I was friends with other students some of whom went on to become Judges, Chief Justices, President of the Ct. of Appeal, Lord Presidents, top Civil Servants etc. I learnt politics from the likes of Syed Albar and even when back in Kuala Lumpur he would come to my house weekends and drive me around Kuala Lumpur introducing me to the whos who of Malay politics. Hussein Onn would tell me Malayan political history.

When I moved to Kelantan I got to know the various political leaders in PAS like Asri, Zulkifli and Wan Mustapha. In fact PAS was the first to offer me to stand for election. When I joined the Legal Service, I served in Johor and Perak and built up further my network of friends.

 When I was in private practice I represented the Governor of Sarawak in the case of Stephen Kalong Ningkan. I was in Allen & Gledhill then and a very junior lawyer too but the senior partner asked me to do it as he thought that I was able to handle it as he considered me well read and thorough in my work plus he knew that I was well versed in the politics of the day. It was during this case that I got to know Tun Razak, Tun Rahman Yakob and Tan Sri Taib Mahmmud. At 28, I attended my first Cabinet meeting to brief the Cabinet on the case. I never thought that 18 years later I would be attending it weekly.

Tengku Razaleigh and Manan Othman for reasons known to themselves, recommended to Hussein Onn that I be appointed a Senator. Suddenly people wanted to find out who this Daim was. Manan when he was Minister of Public Enterprise, put me on Board of UDA as I was recognized as a successful property developer then and later made me chairman of Peremba. When Tun Mahathir became PM, he appointed me as Chairman of Fleet Group. Tan Sri Sanusi made me Chairman of Rakyat First Merchant Bank. In 1984, Tun Mahathir made me Minister of Finance.

It is from all these people that I learnt so much and who had in some way or the other helped me in my professional, business and political life.

I was also a busy body and had an opinion on everything. I was there when Tan Chee Koon, Lim Chong Eu and Syed Hussein formed Parti Gerakan. I took part in the debate on the issue of Bahasa Kebangsaan and had friends who alerted me that I was to be arrested under the ISA on the issue. I wrote letters to the Prime Ministers in office, offering them my 2 cents worth, the advice unasked and often ignored but that did not deter me. 

  I started my private practice with some savings and a RM60k loan from MARA. I furnished my office frugally and spent the rest on the stock market. When May 13 came I almost lost the shirt on my back. I learnt there and then that the stock market is not a casino for me to gamble in but that investment has to be made through informed choices. Later when I decided to go back to the market I only invested in quality and strategic stocks.

Before I could invest in these quality stocks I had to make money to pay off my debts. Luckily I had my practice; but the need to succeed was too strong for me to remain purely a lawyer. Not one to give up, I decided to go into business. I invested in a salt making business – everyone needs salt right? well, an unseasonal storm washed that away! I went into many businesses that didn’t do too well, until I decided to go into property development. I approached Dato Harun Idris then MB of Selangor for a piece of an abandoned, disused mining land. I paid the premium for it and finally was on the road to success. It was not easy going. It would have been easier if it was a piece of flat estate land, instead I had manylakes to be filled before I can build.

But if it had been easy then I’m not sure I would have learnt the lessons that failure teaches you. Failure is a great teacher if you are willing to learn. My tenacity was my strength. I never gave up. As Churchill said “Success is not final and failure is not fatal. It is the courage to continue that counts”. I stumbled, picked myself up and continued.

By the time I was in my mid thirties I was a millionaire. With the money I made I went looking for my strategic stakes not only in the stock market but also in properties. By the time I join the Cabinet I was the shareholder of Raleigh Bhd (a name famous worldwide for its bicycle, made since 1887) Raleigh had shares in Prudential and had landed properties and another listed company. I bought into UEP which had a 1,400 acre land bank which I later reversed into SIME for shares, making me the single largest shareholder of SIME then. I also had a Joint Venture with the State Government of Kedah to develop 2,000 acres of converted land. Maluri also JV’ed with PNB to develop 600 acres of land in Kajang. I had a housing estate in Malacca. My land bank was massive. I was also a founding shareholder and chairman of TV3. I was also the largest individual shareholder in Nestle, and in Jaya Jusco. I had 4 factories in Malacca producing cast iron, plastic, packaging and preserved foods. I also invested in a haulage company. I also had a stake in UMBC Bank. I’m telling you all this not to show off and impress you but to share with you my journey.

When I was asked by Dr Mahathir to join the Government I had to think very carefully. I knew it will be a sacrifice on my part to take the offer but then this would not be the first time I have been asked to sacrifice in the name of national interest. When I had the opportunity to increase my share in SIME to 30% Dr. Mahathir heard about it and asked me not to take it up as it would be better to be given to PNB. When UMNO youth objected to MCA buying shares in UMBC, MCA approached me to exchange my controlling shares in Malaysian French Bank for a non controlling stake in UMBC. I was not keen to give up control in one for non-controlling in another, further I had to borrow as I was buying into a bigger bank, but the government insisted on the exchange for economic and political stability. By the time the deal was completed I was made MoF and later had to sell my stake. The government insisted that I can only sell to a Bumi or Bumi company and at cost too! I had much higher offers from non Bumis and could have made money on this sale but I have no choice. On top of it all, I had to pay tax on the sale too!

As I said earlier, it was a sacrifice on my part. Joining the Government also meant that I would have to give up my business. I was rich and answered to no one. I was carefree and wanted to enjoy the fruits of my labour. I had my privacy which I value highly. It was a difficult decision to make. I took more than a month to think it over. Whilst I would sacrifice a life of greater wealth, there is more to life than making money and more money. At some point you have to look beyond material wealth and personal interest. In the end the call to serve was made, partially because growing up my father had always drummed it into my head that there was no better calling than to be serving the government. That to be of service is an honour. And he also thought that I should be Prime Minister. In fact when I was appointed MoF and I told him, he replied “bukan PM?”!! Obviously he thought very highly of me.

There has been bouquets and brickbats, but I did not take the job to win a popularity contest. National interest comes first and in the end, you have to do what you think is best for the nation. Joining the government has brought me immense satisfaction to see the economy succeed from an agrarian economy to an industrialised economy. If I had not joined the government I would have been far richer in wealth but so much poorer in experience. If there is any regret, it is regret for the loss of my privacy.

I couldn’t have done all this on my own. The friends I knew, the network I built was very useful. You cannot be successful if you are a hermit staying in your house watching TV after work. Whether its through school, work or sports, there is always an opportunity to meet people. Networking, building relationships, what the Chinese called “quan xi”, is important in business – you never know who you meet may be your guardian angel in disguise. Of course I’m not suggesting that you make friends for an ulterior motive – if you are not sincere, people can see through you. If you use people, it can only work once or twice before you lose your reputation and that, if once lost cannot be recovered.

Whenever I travel and meet people I would always write to them, to thank them, to keep in touch, to invite them over etc. So wherever I went I always knew someone or the other. But mix with like minded people. Your so called friends can lead you astray. As I have said earlier,networking is very important but is of no use when all you do with your network of friends is to “omong-omong kosong”.

Saudara, Saudari / Ladies and Gentlemen

After retirement I had no ministry and no company to run. All my life I have been active and staying home doing gardening and playing golf did not appeal to me. So I went to the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard. I spent my time reading, meeting people, attending lectures. After a few months I was restless. I reassessed my situation – do I restart in Malaysia? If I did, and succeeded, my success would be questioned as I still had friends and contacts both in and out of Government. I had nothing to prove but I thought if I could succeed in Malaysia, maybe I could do so overseas. As I’ve said earlier Malays have been criticised that they can only succeed because of the NEP, I thought that I owe it to the Malays to prove otherwise.

In the course of my work as MoF I travelled and engaged with various people, government and non-government everywhere. I had visited Eastern Europe and was convinced that Russia could not hold on to them for very long.

In 1994 I started my banks in Republic of Czech and then Hungary, Albania, Bosnia. Whatever we may say of Russia, it left behind a very good education system and excellent infrastructure. Still, it was tough to do business there. There is the question of language and there was no experience of market economy. It was not easy to get Malaysians to work there and the locals were used to working for the government. We had to motivate them to work for profit, to understand that we go into business to make profit, profit to pay salaries, bonuses and to expand.

If Eastern Europe was tough, Africa was tougher. Why Africa? Its too long to go into but if you are interested I’ve given my reasons in a separate paper. Its with Tengku Zafrul. It was not easy for us to start in Africa. We were not Citibank or HSBC or Standard Chartered. Whilst most of the Governments in Africa knew me when I was MoF and I was involved in both the Smart Partnership and South-South Cooperation, nobody knew the Bank. Tun Dr. Mahathir’s name carries a lot of weight and Malaysia under him was held in high esteem. All these helped but we still had to prove ourselves and further we had to carry the burden of maintaining Malaysia’s good name. Failure was not an option.

Africa was tough. There was little discipline, most do not have the expertise nor the experience. The better ones had left and were in Europe or America. The pool to draw staff was small. If it was difficult to entice Malaysians to Eastern Europe, you can imagine what it was like to ask them to go to Africa!

We started from scratch. Fortunately for me, I had an excellent team who understood and shared my vision. The team you build is critical. You cannot do it alone.

My team were as determined as me to succeed. We had put our money there and our reputation and the country’s reputation were at stake. My team were motivated and prepared to sacrifice the comforts of home to blaze a trail there. It was pure team work and dedication that made it. Without a good team, no way would we be where we are today. Our banks have won many awards, particularly Euromoney’s Bank of the Year awards, some of them repeatedly. I am very proud of them. And I must add that we have a good reputation in Africa. Wherever I go and I meet Presidents, Prime Ministers, MoF, Governors of Central Bank of countries where we operate and where we don’t, they now know us and of us and are happy with us. They see that we have been fair and honest. We treat them as partners and equals. We train the locals and it is a measure of our success that our local staff are always in demand and poached by other financial institutions. We get a lot of requests to open up in their countries but we are limited by our resources. We cannot over-stretch ourselves and end up with quantity but not quality. Quality is of the utmost importance.

Today we have a presence in 10 countries in Africa and have also expanded our reach into Asia; Indonesia, Bangladesh, Laos, and are looking at other neighbouring countries. People must think that you have to be immensely rich to be in Europe, Africa and Asia, but that is not true. When we first started, the paid up for each bank was only US$2 million. Today a European bank’s paid up must be at least Euro 5 million, in Yemen for example, US$20 million, and in Nigeria US$100 million. With that kind of requirement, we had to reassess our business plans. We sold off Europe and with the proceeds decided to go to Asia.

In every business you start with a plan but the plan has to re evaluated, reassessed, and reconsidered at every turn. What works today may not necessarily work tomorrow. Facts change, operating conditions change and we must change with them. Business is not static and we cannot run on the spot.

I know I have gone on too much, boring you with my personal history. I should have just quoted my son’s one paragraph biography he wrote of me when he was in primary school: “My father was born in Kedah. He studied law and became a lawyer, then a businessman, then MoF twice. He is now retired and runs banks and does charitable work. He is a good father because he plays football with me.”

Seriously, though, what distinguish one who succeeds from one who fails? Everyone I’m sure starts out wanting success, but it has been said that success usually comes to those who were too busy to look for it. It is a sacrifice. You will have to defer immediate gratification and forgo leisure. You have to be the first to arrive and the last to leave. It really is hard work and nothing else. There is just no substitute for hard work. But you cannot work hard stupidly. You have to plan, execute the plan, change the plan when necessary to suit changing situations. As was said by Darwin – “It is not the strongest of the species that survive, nor the most intelligent, but the one that is most adaptable to change”. How do you know that the situation changes? You have to read, read and read. Read all the time. Be curious about the world around you. Try to keep up with the latest in technology and business, the latest trends and the geo political changes too. As an example, when I read that the French Government was nationalising its banks I realised that it would have to sell its bank in Malaysia as Malaysia then did not allow government owned banks to operate in Malaysia. I saw an opportunity here and decided to contact the French Government to take over the Indo-Suez Bank which I later renamed the Malaysian French Bank. Nothing ventured, nothing gained.

It is also important that you take the opportunity to work in and learn from businesses that have been successful. It is no embarrassment to say you don’t know and to be aware of your own limitations. Never be too proud to learn from others. But on the other hand, do not follow blindly. If someone is successful at one thing it does not mean that you can too. You have to know yourself. It helps if you can do something that you love. As Confucius said “Choose a job that you love and you will never have to work a day in your life”. You have to be hands-on. No one is interested in your success except you. Its your money, and in most cases, borrowed money. You have to ensure your own success. You are your own best asset and the master of your own destiny, to make your own future. You have a choice to either work hard, remain committed, diligent, determined and disciplined or just buy a lottery ticket and hope to get rich overnight!

For the Malays particularly I say this to you – do not be afraid of competition. We are used to competing – we have other races to measure against, so there is no reason why we can’t succeed. Don’t believe in handouts, there is no such thing as a free lunch. Handouts do not test you and when faced with adversity, the price of that handout is failure.

For the Non-Malays, I say this to you – Do not accept any discrimination or perceived discrimination as an excuse for failure. See it as an obstacle to overcome and an opportunity to strengthen your resolve.


Do not fear the fear of failure. Do not fear to take chances. Do not fear of making mistakes that will shatter your confidence and fill you with doubts. You have to take a chance on life. When one door closes another opens but you have to look for that open door and not remain fixated on the closed door. Move on, you have done what you can. Learn from it and that will give you confidence in the next venture.

In your quest for success, be wary of making compromises; your values and beliefs will be tested. Have a clear conscience in what you do as you have to face the mirror everyday. Do not let praise go to you head nor criticism weigh you down. Have faith in yourself and faith in God. He will not let you down.

When you have achieved material successes, live simply and shun extravagance and arrogance. Do not lose all that you have achieved because you were resting on your laurels. What happens when that laurel wilts? Be humble and reach out to those less fortunate than you. Your success is an obligation and a responsibility to your society and it is only when you give back to society that you are truly successful.

Ladies and Gentlemen/ Saudara, Saudari

Be brave to leave your ‘kampung’ and go anywhere in the world to claim your future. I wish you well. 

Friday, 10 August 2012

Siapa Penentu Harga Minyak Dunia?






Part 1:
Saya perhati, kalau kita yang rakyat marhaen ni banyak membaca, kita boleh banyak menemui PENIPUAN PKR, contohnya dalam senario industri minyak negara kita. Saya akan fokus kepada industri minyak negara kita dalam 3 bahagian (3 part) Baiklah, saya nak kongsikan link yang mempunyai info2 dan fakta untuk tatapan pembaca. Baca sini dan sini.


Saya yakin PR tidak suka rakyat biasa seperti kita membaca informasi dan fakta2 seperti ini, akan menyebabkan mereka susah sikit untuk menipu.

Contohnya, orang PR kata negara Malaysia adalah negara pengeluar dan pengeksport minyak yang besar. Sebenarnya tidak benar sama sekali. Kita sebagai rakyat gunakan minyak hampir sama dengan jumlah pengeluaran kita sendiri. So jika ada orang PR cuba nak buat perangai kecoh pasal cerita minyak ni, kita guna je info ni kepada mereka, mereka akan ternganga.

Sebab ada satu orang PR ni cubalah nak dakwah versi PR mengenai senario minyak di negara kita di salah satu restoran di Kelana Jaya, depan kawan2 kami yang ramai. So saya bukak fakta2 ini, akhirnya member PR yang dok buat dakwah tu terdiam, dia cakap kat saya "BAGILAH CAN". Dan saya cakap balik, 'Kalaulah hangpa tak menipu dan fokus buat kerja kan bagus".

Dan rakyat lain yang mengetahui fakta2 ini boleh gunakan di mana saja tempat PR dok buat dakwah pasal industri minyak malaysia, mesti depa pening kepala.  


Part 2:
Betuika Malaysia ni kawal harga minyak? Takdalah, Malaysia kawal subsidi yang dok absorb harga minyak sebenar. Harga minyak dikawal oleh pasaran (supply and demand) dunia. 60% harga minyak sebenar ADALAH SPEKULASI. So siapa yang dok setting harga minyak dunia ni? Ada 2 organisasi setakat ini iaitu New York Mercantile Exchange dan OPEC. Ok, siapa mereka ni? Baca siapa New York Mercantile Exchange ni.


Dalam masa beberapa tahun lagi, OPEC akan hilang kuasa sebab Amerika baru jumpa kawasan tadahan minyak baru di negara mereka iaitu di Utara Amerika, yang lebih besar dari Arab Saudi, Iran dan lain2 negara Arab.

Dan akan ada HANYA SATU ORGANISASI DI DUNIA YANG AKAN KAWAL SPEKULASI DAN MENENTUKAN HARGA MINYAK iaitu New York Mercantile Exchange. 





New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX) telah mengawal harga komoditi strategik seperti minyak semenjak 1880an. Pada 1933, seluruh dunia berada di bawah telunjuk mereka. Tetapi pada 10 September 1960, suatu usaha telah diwujudkan untuk mengekang penguasaan dan ekspoitasi NYMEX.

Saya akan buka cerita siapa OPEC, kenapa Malaysia tidak mampu untuk join OPEC dan kenapa OPEC sudah hilang kuasa pasaran minyak dunia. Bersiap sedialah negara Islam yang sangat bergantung dengan industri minyak dalam import dan export mereka untuk DIBUNGKUSKAN.

Part 3 :
Penubuhan OPEC memang tidak disenangi oleh negara2 barat terutamanya badan2 seperti New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX).

Untuk menjadi ahli OPEC, kena mempunyai kadar nett export yang tinggi. Malaysia tidak mampu jadi ahli OPEC sebab nett export kita rendah. Kita mengeluarkan 693,000 tong / sehari dan mengunakanya 541,000 tong / sehari. Ini menunjukkan Malaysia tidak dikategorikan sebagai negara minyak yang kaya seperti diceritakan oleh puak2 PR.

Suatu usaha telah diwujudkan oleh organisasi seperti NYMEX untuk melemahkan OPEC secara beransur-ansur. Dan pada hari ini, OPEC tidak lagi mempunyai kuasa menentukan pasaran minyak. Mangsa pertama dari usaha melemahkan OPEC adalah Shah Iran, iaitu orang yang mengilhamkan penubuhan OPEC.  

Semenjak kehilangan Shah Iran melalui Revolusi Iran, telah menyebabkan OPEC semakin lemah. Dan pada 1981, OPEC sudah mula hilang kawalan terhadap pasaran minyak.

Kehilangan semangat kesatuan hati antara ahli seperti yang mereka ada pada 1960an adalah salah satu faktor kejatuhan OPEC. Dengan peperangan Iraq dan Iran, dengan Arab Saudi lebih mengikut telunjuk US, dan penemuan sumber tenaga alternatif telah berjaya melemahkan OPEC. Baca sini.

Pada hari ini, secara rasmi NYMEX atau Barat telah menguasai OPEC melalui salah seorang ahli mereka iaitu Iraq. Dan secara rasminya OPEC berada di bawah telunjuk NYMEX. Kalau NYMEX kata harga minyak hari USD 100/tong, diorang kena ikut, termasuklah kita yang ciput ni.


Dan setelah kehilangan pengaruh OPEC, HANYA SATU organisasi yang berkuasa menentukan nilai pasaran minyak dunia iaitu New York Mercantile Exchange.Hari ini, spekulator2 di belakang NYMEX seperti Soros dan lain2 telah menjadi sangat berkuasa. Mereka sangat berkuasa sampai boleh jatuhkan suatu kerajaan dengan petik jari sahaja melalui spekulasikan harga minyak. Dengan menaikkan harga minyak, suatu kerajaan boleh jatuh dengan mudah. Iyelah, rakyat bagi sesuatu kerajaan SEMESTINYA menyalahkan kerajaan sebab harga minyak naik bukannya NYMEX. Kita boleh lihat negara kita cukuplah.
Saya akan kupaskan lebih lanjut mengenai pemimpin2 yang menerima bencana setelah MENENTANG spekulator di belakang NYMEX dan terutamanya bagaimana mereka menggunakan Islam untuk menjatuhkan Islam sendiri, supaya NYMEX terus menguasai pasaran minyak dan komoditi2 penting lain. 


Sebelum saya masuk topik tersebut, baca ini, macam mana NYMEX ini beroperasi. Steady je diorang, cekap ek, tiada sapa pun salahkan diorang, tapi salahkan kerajaan sahaja :D


"The price of crude oil today is not made according to any traditional relation of supply to demand. It’s controlled by an elaborate financial market system as well as by the four major Anglo-American oil companies. As much as 60% of today’s crude oil price is pure speculation driven by large trader banks and hedge funds. It has nothing to do with the convenient myths of Peak Oil. It has to do with control of oil and its price. How?"

Semoga pembaca semua dapat memahami lebih lanjut industri minyak yang kompleks ni, dan siapa player2 sebenar di belakang harga minyak.

Baca juga -




 

Thursday, 9 August 2012

Isu Rohingya : Kenapa Rohingya Tidak Dibantu?







Isu Rohingya : Persoalan, kenapa Aung Suu Kyi lak sekarang yang jadi tumpuan dunia walhal dia bukan PM pun? Macam nak kena jerat je pasal agenda sebenar pompuan ni. Apsal tak mau bagi Nobel Prize kepada aktivis hak asasi dan keamanan Rohingya?? Depa pun perjuangkan benda yang sama macam Aung Suu Kyi jugak, walhal jauh lebih lama dari Aung Suu Kyi. Apa cerita?? Aku bagitahu korang 3 sebab utama Aung Suu Kyi tidak akan bantu Rohingya dengan apa cara sekalipun, sebaliknya hanya beri kata2 kesian dan rayuan. Dia ni hanya wayang je pasal akal hak asasi ni. Ok, apa 3 sebab tu? :

1. Faktor dan populariti terutama dari ethnik Rakhine dalam pilihanraya, 

2. Faktor strategik utara tanah Rakhine, 
 
 3. Risiko jika Rohingya dibantu, mereka akan minta autonomi.


                                                                                                     
Faktor pertama iaitu faktor sokongan dan populariti : Jika Aung Suu Kyi membantu kaum Rohingya, popularitinya dari penyokong kuatnya iaitu etnik Rakhine di utara pantai barat akan terjejas teruk. Maklumlah, etnik Rakhine yang asyik dok balun Rohingya ni ialah penyokong kuat NDL. Power base politik NDL bermula jauh di Selatan Pantai Barat Myanmar di pekan , di mana Aung Suu Kyi paling popular. Sepanjang pantai barat ini adalah sumber2 sokongan dan kekuatan NDL. Nampak gaya Aung Suu Kyi lebiih fokus kepada populariti dia, hehehe. Itu pasal takat rayuan je.





‎Faktor kedua iaitu faktor strategik utara tanah Rakhine : Hari ni tanah2 di Rakhine State ni lebih fokus kepada Pertanian. Tetapi ada informasi terkini menyatakan kawasan ni adalah paling strategik untuk aktiviti perdagangan seperti pelabuhan dan mempunyai sumber2 strategik yang tinggi seperti  gas dan petroleum. Jika NDL bantu kaum Rohingya ni, mereka akan jadi berpengaruh sebab potensi2 ekonomi di Rakhine ni dan kaum Rohingya boleh jadi potensi pencabar kuat pada power base politik NDL yang sedia ada di situ di kemudian hari. 



Faktor ketiga iaitu risiko jika Rohingya dibantu, mereka akan minta autonomi di utara Rakhine : Dari sejarah kaum Rohingya ni memang selalu memperjuangkan autonomi untuk  mereka kerana kehidupan mereka cukup tertekan. Niat untuk autonomi / merdeka di utara Rakhine ni bermula semenjak 1948 lagi dan ini dianggap sebagai ancaman pada Burma jika utara Rakhine yang mempunyai nilai strategik ini  keluar. Sebab itulah kaum2 Rohingya "dilemahkan" dengan cara sistematik semenjak zaman general Ne Win pada 1974. Dan kita tak pernah dengar perjuangan Aung Suu Kyi ada sebut pasal menyokong Rohingya. Jika Rohingya terus dibantu spenuhnya oleh NDL, mereka akan jadi berpengaruh dan mempunyai claim yang lebih serius untuk permintaan autonomi dari Burma. 


Faktor2 lain yang Aung Suu Kyi takkan bantu hak asasi Rohingya ;

Penyokong kuat Aung Suu Kyi sendiri iaitu Ko Ko Gyi, seorang aktivis hak asasi dalam organisasi 88 Generation group tidak akan terima etnik Rohingya ni dan dianggap sebagai foreign.  Group hak asasi 88 ni sanggup mengangkat senjata untuk lawan "foreign invaders" ni kononnya. Kenyataan dibuat pada Jun 2012. Baca perenggan 11 dalam berita Myanmar ni.

Lagi satu korang fikir sendiri, masalah Rohingya ni dah lama, Aung Suu Kyi ni boleh gunakan pengaruh luar untuk tekan kerajaan Burma sekarang supaya ubah polisi luar negara Burma, termasuk polisi ekonomi Burma,. Tapi untuk hak asasi Rohingya, dia tak buat apa pun, takat rayuan jee. Sebab apa?? Sebab faktor kat atas tu la.



Sebenarnya, ni "lesson learned" untuk kita, sapa ja kecoh pasal ketuanan rakyatlah, hak asasi manusialah, demokrasilah, memang kaki kelentong. Depa saja ja guna istilah ni sebagai mileage untuk berkuasa. Lagi satu, Nobel price keamanan ni hanya untuk support political mileage proksi2 barat je, bukannya ikhlas pun pasal hak asasi manusia. Strategic Interest comes first woi. So kesimpulan untuk Rohingya, tiada siapa akan bantu, termasuklah pemenang hadiah Nobel keamanan / hak asasi. Maklumlah, karier politik jauh lebih penting dari hak asasi etnik Rohingya seramai lebih 700,000 tu. Tak ramai, takde value pun untuk berikan sumber modal manusia untuk buruh murah. Rohingya ni juga takde kerakyatan. Nak cerita apa, kalau fund fight kemerdekaan untuk diorang hanya di kawasan utara pantai barat Myanmar. Kos yayasan2 barat nak labur untuk hak asasi Rohingya ni tak balik modal mcm Arab Spring atau BERSHIT di Malaysia.



Semua sistem yayasan demokrasi dan hak asasi barat adalah hipokrit, ni hanya proksi je macam Anwar, Ambiga dan lain2 kat Malaysia. Kenapa organisasi2 barat sanggup bayar berjuta-juta USD untuk support di Arab seperti Mesir, termasuklah Malaysia seperti BERSHIT tapi Rohingya depa tak support?? Jawapan dia mudah , sebab Rohingya ni takde value strategik. Itu jaa. Ayat hak asasi, demokrasi ni auta ja. 

Aung Suu Kyi ni berjuang untuk kariernya dan strategik interest dia, maklumlah dia proksi barat. Contoh di Kachin border state China, kat situ etnik pecah dua ; satu pro barat dan satu pro China. Aung Suu Kyi support etnik yang pro barat. Di Kachin mana ada Islam pun. Ni bukan faktor agama, tapi faktor strategik interest. 


Ia tidak ada kena mengena dengan Islam atau agama lain. Ia berkenaan dengan nilai strategik. Kalau Rohingya ni ada nilai strategik yang tinggi, gerenti Aung Suu Kyi tolong punya untuk best interest politik dia dan majikan dia iaitu barat. Sama macam di barat, kenapa tiba2 US consider Ikhwanul Muslimin sebagai "safe deposit" diorang?? Sebab ada nilai strategik untuk stop pengaruh pesaing barat iaitu ChIna dan Russia di Asia Barat, itu jee. Hak asasi manusia ni semua cover up je, semuanya sebab nilai strategik. 

Ni untuk bacaan tambahan. Isu di Kachin Myanmar iaitu mengenai Dam Myitsone. Ia dikatakan akan berlaku perang saudara di Myanmar sebab dam ni, maklumlah dam ni kononnya menguntungkan China lak. Hangpa boleh tengok NDL atau Aung Suu Kyi geng belah mana...

Wednesday, 8 August 2012

Something about Tun Mahathir ...





Tun Mahathir in a cartoon? Well I can guess that Tun M really have deep effects on this cartoon creator


There’s something I would like to share with you guys. I still remember the days my organization had a meeting with this man inside his car on the way to his office. He don’t waste anytime at all even on the road to office, always something to do. I heard 24 hours are not enough for this man. And have you guys ever seen him playing golf?

 
In 1996, I was his hater. I even joined the reformation movement at Masjid India vicinity.
In 1999, currency control; worked compared to IMF proposed by Anwar. I am amazed and felt embarrassed at the same time cause I was DSAI supporter at that time.
In 2002 – 2003, he resigned. I read all his books and his speeches. I love the practicality, reality and especially the way of thinking “WE CAN BE AS GOOD OR EVEN BETTER THAN THE WHITE GUYS, IF WE WORK HARD ENOUGH”. I became a fan and became DSAI hater until today.

If anyone meant Tun cause the loss of order or any civil liberties, personally I don’t feel any loss at all, either order or civil liberties, or any mumbos jumbos raised by the self-proclaimed freedom fighters from High priced lawyers in Bar Council or whatever. To be real, the loss I’ve felt is my time wasted when I joined the stupid reformation movement. I should focusing on my studies instead.

Tuesday, 7 August 2012

Isu Rohingya - Hipokrasi Nobel Keamanan






Nak tergelak orang dok kecoh pasal hadiah Nobel Keamanan Aung Suu Kyi. Korang tak sedar hadiah nobel ni hipokrit, dah kena hijack dari tujuan asalnya oleh orang2 berkuasa di barat untuk bagi political mileage pada proksi2 mereka, itu je. Dari gaya, Aung Suu Kyi ni nak jadikan negara dia sebagai "buffer state" untuk barat bagi sekat / balance pengaruh China di Indo China, bukan untuk demokrasi atau hak asasi manusia pun. Rakyat dia sendiri iaitu Rohingya Islam takde hak asasi, si Aung ni buat blur je sebab dah bukan niat asal dia pun. 


Ini bukan sebab faktor non Islam ke atau Islam, ini sebab betui ka dia ni nak fight hak asasi manusia atau jadi proksi barat, itu je cerita dia. Korang baca je back ground dia dan keluarga dia, baca dari zaman Pol Pot lagi. Dia ni poyo je.


Kalau hangpa nak tau, kita sendiri iaitu sebahagian ASEAN pun pernah termakan dengan cerita US kononnya Khmer Rouge atau Pol Pot khususnya adalah pejuang demokrasi dan penegak hak asasi manusia. Maklumlah masa tu kita ada sentimen anti Soviet dan anti Vietnam Utara, dan kebetulan Soviet dan Vietnam Utara sponsor People's Republic of Kampuchea. Last2 apa Pol Pot dan Khmer Rouge buat??? Hak ake mana, demokrasi pun ke mana, tepuk dahi geng!!


Ni dia tengok, kita boleh termakan dengan sembang Khmer Rouge kononnya nak tegakkan hak asasi dan demokrasi, depa siap buat ‘Patriotic and Democratic Front of the Great National Union of Kampuchea’. Negara2 barat termasuk ASEAN support mereka ni di UN, last2 apa jadi?? Lu orang sendiri mau ingat. 


So apa bezanya Khmer Rouge dan Aung Suu Kyi ni?? Bezanya hanya jantina je, laki dengan pompuan. Tapi semua pakai akai yang sama untuk political mileage dan sokongan iaitu hak asasi manusia dan demokrasi untuk jadi berkuasa. ‘PAYMASTER’ pun sama iaitu dari barat. Tengok bila Aung Suu Kyi berkuasa, apa dia buat?? Dia buat blur je pada hak asasi manusia Rohingya. La ni aku duk agak kerajaan Malaysia dok tepuk dahi ni, "Apa dah jadi ni oi, takkan sama mcm cerita Khmer Rouge kot?"

Yang malangnya kita jugak, sebab kita dok percaya kat si Aung Suu Kyi ni.  Macam dulu gak kita boleh pi percaya kat Khmer Rouge, Pol Pot / Khieu Samphan atas alasan sama iaitu hak asasi manusia dan demokrasi. La ni apa Malaysia boleh buat untuk bantu Rohingya? Tengok jela. Kalau bantu nanti dituduh lak political intervention, maklumlah Malaysia cukup support minah ni. 

Sebenarnya ni ‘lesson learned’. Siapa saja yang duk kecoh pasal ketuanan rakyatla, hak asasi manusialah, demokrasilah memang kaki kelentong. Depa saja je guna istilah ni sebagai mileage untuk berkuasa.


Kenapa Aung Suu Kyi sangat berkuasa di Burma?? Sebab back-up dari ASEAN dan Barat. Kesian pada USDP, China dan Russia yang memilih untuk back up ASEAN. Aung Suu Kyi dengan kering je instruct Perdana Menteri Burma, Thein Sein untuk ubah polisi luar negara Burma dengan Barat. Lagi satu, dengan kering je Aung Suu Kyi instruct untuk open ekonomi Burma eklusif dalam bidang2 tertentu kepada barat dan Perdana Menteri Myanmar tunduk. Tengok betapa berkuasanya Aung Suu Kyi ni. Tapi ada dia gunakan kuasa dia untuk bantu Rohingya?? Takde, takat merayu je. 

Tahu sebab apa orang ramai mula ‘MARK’ dia?? Kekejaman terhadap Rohingya bukan setakat dilakukan oleh Junta, tapi dilakukan juga oleh etnik2 lain di Utara Rakhine. Etnik2 ini adalah penyokong kuat dan ahli parti politik NDL iaitu parti politik Aung Suu Kyi!! 


Lagi satu aku nak tanya, apasal pesaing2 politik Aung Suu Kyi dalam dan luar negara Burma gunakan isu Rohingya ni untuk malukan karier politik Aung Suu Kyi, bukannya Thein Sein?? Sebab depa tau sapa boss dia yang sebenar dan depa tau yang Aung Suu Kyi ni pun TIDAK MENENTANG cadangan jangka panjang Thein Sein pada 2012 untuk ‘RELOCATE’ kaum Rohingya ni keluar dari Tanah Rakhine yang mempunyai nilai strategik yang cukup tinggi kepada karier ahli2 Politik Burma. Sebab tu dia merayu je, tapi halangnya tidak. Tahu tak apa yang ada kat Sittwe iaitu ibukota Rakhine?? Hangpa akan tahu sebab apa Aung Suu Kyi takkan bantu Rohingya ni, sebab NOT THE BEST INTEREST bagi karier politik dia untuk buat power base. 

Hangpa semua pikiaq, kenapa yayasan2 demokrasi dan hak asasi barat khususnya, boleh beri funding ratusan juta USD untuk support Arab Spring di Arab sampai sanggup tumbangkan kerajaan termasuklah di Malaysia, mereka duk support pembangkang spt gerakan BERSHIT tapi DEPA TAK MAU SUPPORT ROHINGYA?? Depa kata depa perjuangkan hak asasi dan demokrasi. Apa cerita?? Jawapannya mudah je, Rohingya ni TAKDE NILAI STRATEGIK. Macam Arab dan Malaysia ada nilai2 strategiknya seperti bursa saham, selat2 strategik, sumber2 strategik dan lain2 untuk bargain. Itulah dia hipokrasinya idea hak asasi dan demokrasi ni.

Monday, 6 August 2012

Tak Bersyukur ke Jadi Rakyat Malaysia?

Member aku yang balik dari India tunjuk kat aku gambaq2 yang dia pi kilang kain kat India. Actually bukan kain sangat laa, tapi dia handle benda2 interior ni macam bath mat, cushion, dining linen, curtain dan lain2. Supplier kitorang nak cut cost kan, so cariklaa kilang2 pemprosesan di India.


Kos buruh di India murah. Begitu jugak dengan kos kain, kos pembuatan, pemprosesan sampailah ke kos pengangkutan menggunakan kapal. Bila dia tunjuk kat aku gambaq2 pekerja kat sana yang menenun bath mat pakai mesin tangan, aku kesian tengok depa. Bayangkanlah, depa menenun sampai naik kasaq tangan, bath mat tu dijual di Malaysia dengan harga RM9.90 je. Kemahiran depa ni bukan semua orang boleh buat tapi barang yang depa hasilkan dijual denga harga murah jee .... Dan depa jugak ada yang kena pakai mask sebab cotton, polyester masuk dalam hidung. Bayangkanlah lagi bila hari2 masuk dalam hidung, tak ke naya. Mau sesak dada, kena penyakit.




 Keadaan dalam kilang. Sadis.



 Kat Malaysia ada macam ni tak?


Lebih kurang proses menenun songket kat Malaysia tapi yang ni berhabuk, kena pakai mask


 Bath Mat yang dijual di Malaysia berharga RM9.90. Je.



Bila aku tengok gambaq keadaan kilang yang daif, nak masuk show room dan kilang pun kena lalu laluan yang tak rata, sempit dan member aku habaq kadang2 babi hutan duk melintas, aku jadi insaf. Kalau kat Malaysia takat kucing dengan anjing je melintas kan. Aku bersyukur sangat2 tinggal di Malaysia yang penyokong pembangkang duk habaq Malaysia ni negara korup la, tak amalkan hudud la, apalah. Tapi sebagai rakyat marhaen yang biasa2 sahaja, aku mengharapkan negara yang aku diami ini masih mampu menyediakan peluang pekerjaan kepada rakyatnya dan mampu menjana ekonomi yang adil untuk semua kaum. Itu sahaja. Yang lain2 boleh diperbetulkan tapi yang utama tu kita kena tengok. 



Rumah diperbuat daripada tahi lembu. Diulang, tahi lembu ye.
 

Tapi oleh kerana aku dah terlibat dalam politik, so aku ialah rakyat Malaysia yang demand. Demand di sini bermaksud aku mahu Malaysia bukan sahaja baik dari segi ekonomi, tetapi juga hal2 lain. Banyak isu2 yang diutarakan oleh pihak pembangkang membuatkan aku sedar. Sedar bahawa di bumi bertuah ini masih ada yang tidak memahami erti SYUKUR, iaitu golongan yang sentiasa mencanangkan cerita2 fitnah, picisan dan mengenepikan usaha pihak yang bertanggungjawab untuk memajukan lagi ekonomi negara.
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Share this