Fakta mengenai Nuklear

Allah SWT mencipta uranium ni bersebab, kitalah yang kena kaji dan belajar mengenai penggunaannya. Jepun yang baru kena kat Fukushima, masih teruskan usaha membina loji2 nuklear ni, sekarang dah ada 55 buah kilang nuklear di Jepun. Kyoto Protokol datang dari Jepun. So kena fikir kenapa mereka masih teruskan, apa kebaikannya. Jangan terus tengok keburukannya. 

“Demi sesungguhnya! Kami telah mengutus Rasul-rasul Kami dengan membawa bukti-bukti dan mukjizat yang jelas nyata, dan Kami telah menurunkan bersama-sama mereka Kitab Suci dan keterangan yang menjadi neraca keadilan, supaya manusia dapat menjalankan keadilan. Dan Kami telah menurunkan besi dengan keadaannya mengandungi kekuatan yang handal serta berbagai faedah lagi bagi manusia. (Dijadikan besi dengan keadaan yang demikian, supaya manusia menggunakan faedah-faedah itu dalam kehidupan mereka sehari-hari) dan supaya ternyata pengetahuan Allah tentang orang yang (menggunakan kekuatan handalnya itu untuk) menegak dan mempertahankan ugama Allah serta menolong Rasul-rasulNya, padahal balasan baiknya tidak kelihatan (kepadanya) sesungguhnya Allah Maha Kuat, lagi Maha Kuasa. “

Al-Hadid 57:25

Janakuasa dari uranium pallet SEBESAR KUKU kita saja adalah bersamaan dengan 17,000 ft3 Gas Asli, 800 kilogram Arang Batu, 570 liter minyak (2 tong lebih). Dan setiap pallet ni boleh bertahan lama. Dengan penemuan jenis "fast efficient reactors" hari ni, seluruh dunia boleh bertahan dengan sumber uranium yang ada di dunia ni selama 2,500 tahun!!! Ok sendiri mau ingatla, negeri mat Bangla dari Bangladesh tu pun dah buat 2 reaktor macam ni!! Kita belum lagi!! 

Fakta : Hanya 2 orang mati di Fukushima apabila kilang nuklear mencair, ianya terbakar disebabkan tsunami. Masalah kat Jepun tu sebab kena tsunami 150 tahun sekali, dan dari human error sebab tak shutdown. Yang teruk sekali ialah bursa saham Jepun, orang melompat takut sebab dengar ayat radiasi, jatuh saham Jepun. Radiasi memang tinggi di reaktor, tapi di sekeliling mereka mendapati radiasi ini hampir sama dengan radiasi yang kita hadapi sekarang, iaitu natural radiasi. 

Fakta : Fukushima has so far released about 10% as much radiation as Chernobyl, Japan’s nuclear safety agency said. Dah advance la teknologi nuklear sekarang. 90% reduction of radiation from leakage. Oleh itu it is a GO for nuke. 

Hydro, Biomass dan Nuclear adalah yang terbaik sekarang. Tapi kelebihan Nuklear adalah ruang untuk letak power plant tidak sebesar yang diperlukan seperti Hydro. Hydro memang jimat, tapi kawasan tadahan yang diperlukan adalah besar. Contohnya Hydro Bakun mampu membekalkan janakuasa untuk 1/3 seluruh Borneo Sabah dan Sarawak. Jika sudah maju,  ia memerlukan kawasan tadahan sebesar Singapore. 3 nuklear power boleh ganti Bakun tak salah saya.

Apa itu ZONAL? Setiap pembangunan suatu tempat mempunyai bahagian2 zon, seperti zon perumahan, zon industri, zon perniagaan. Power plant diletakkan di zon perindustrian, sebab industri yang paling banyak pakai power. Kalau jauh transmisi, kos akan naik  untuk industri yang banyak pakai. 

Padanlah GDP Selangor sekarang dah negative, sebab PKR punya bodoh. Depa dok ingat teknologi nuklear ni sama macam 60an dulu, sekarang dah advance la. Arang batu lebih teruk sekarang, tiap2 hari radiasi dok keluar dari pembakaran abu arang batu. Seeloknya bacalah dulu teknologi baru nuklear tu, bukan terus buat kesimpulan. Aku awal2 tak setuju, tapi bila aku baca tekno baru nuke ni, aku setuju dan ia dibuktikan di Fukushima sendiri, 90% radiation reduction leakage berbanding chernobyl dulu. Rujuk sini dan sini.

Mengenai sumber tenaga lain seperti solar atau renewable energy, kita dah ada 11 reaktor renewable energy. Kombinasi 11 tu tak sampai pun 100MW kapasiti. Kita perlukan minimum 1 power plant yang mampu supply minimum 700MWkapasiti sekarang. Bukannya kerajaan tak pandang renewable energy pun, tapi belum sampai masa optimum lagi. Rujuk sini.

Loji Nuklear takdak TNT. Paling ramai mati akibat letupan loji nuclear dalam sejarah adalah letupan Chernobyl, iaitu 31 orang pada tahun 1986. Pada tahun yang sama jugak dari rekod World Health Organisation (WHO), orang yang mati akibat dari kesan fossil fuel power plant dalam lingkungan 1,800,000 orang. Ini fakta.

Kelemahan untuk implementasi loji nuclear di negara kita adalah kelemahan pemimpin BN untuk membuka mata rakyat dengan penerangan mengenai status sekarang iaitu perbandingan fosil fuel power plant dengan loji nuclear dari segi keselamatan / kesihatan dan juga dari segi aspek ekonomi. Ini sangat menyedihkan. Bagi saya, rakyat ramai tidak tahu mengenai perbandingan ini dan kebaikan yang akan dibawa kepada seluruh rakyat Malaysia.

p/s : US sampai hari ini tak boleh buktikan Iran ada ICBM, sama macam Iraq dulu, WMD adalah satu penipuan. Nak buat ICBM tu bukan RM10, Iran pun boleh bankrap kalau diorang buat ICBM (Intercontinental Ballistic Missle) - click here

Bacaan tambahan -  http://diskusisiber.blogspot.com/2011/03/science-talk-9-analisis-ayat-al-quran.html

The Effect of Fossil Fuel Power Plant

Steffen Hentrich of the German Liberal Institute presented a comparison of the safety of various sources of energy. Is this claim founded on solid data and facts, or is it run-away hysteria?.Shown are the number of deaths per terawatt-hour of energy produced. Coal Fired Power Plant is the highest.

1)    Photovoltaic power generation kills, per terawatt-hour, 11 times more people than nuclear. 

2)    From Fossil Fuel Power Plant - Worldwide, indoor smoke from solid fuel combustion causes about 21% of deaths from lower respiratory infections, 35% of deaths from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and about 3% of deaths from lung cancer.

3)    Indoor air pollution from solid fuel use and urban outdoor air pollution are estimated to be responsible for 3.1 million premature deaths worldwide every year and 3.2% of the global burden of disease.

4)    In the year 2004, outdoor air pollution in urban areas was responsible for almost 1.2 million deaths (2% of all deaths) and 0.6% of the global burden of disease. 

5)    Transportation-related air pollution, which is a significant contributor to total urban air pollution, increases the risks of cardiopulmonary-related deaths and non-allergic respiratory disease. Some evidence supports an association of transportation-related air pollution with increased risks of lung cancer, myocardial infarction, increased inflammatory response and adverse pregnancy outcomes (e.g. premature birth and low birth weight).

How many deaths in Fukushima due to radiation? Can u give me a figure? Serious is Serious, if fossil fuel power plants blows up like that also cause problems like poisonous smoke in the air and that is a confirm death if that happen. But in Fukushima still 0 death toll due to radiation. In normal working condition without blowing up like in Fukushima, nuke is safe but fossil fuel power plant already cause death 4.3 million deaths on yearly basis worldwide due to the smoke they emitted. That’s a fact. 

Every type of plants whether fossil fuel or nuclear will have their own problems. The question now is, which cause less problems? Humans already figure out the techniques and methods to mitigate radiation hence Fukushima with 0 deaths from radiation. But human still unable to figure out the techniques to mitigate poisonous fumes in our air effectively. In normal and stable working condition fossil fuel already cause worldwide 4.3 million deaths on yearly basis from the carbon and poison emission. That is only in normal working condition, what if it blows up?

There are reasons that Kyoto Protocol now favors nuclear power plant over fossil fuel power we have now. Even Greenpeace top leaderships changed their mind and now favors nuclear. And whole of EU they increasing it to 19 reactors, today they got 195. First, the nuke techno have evolved since Chernobyl days, they are more safe and cheap than before compare to fossil fuel power plants.

German : The Pioneer of Biggest Builders & Investors Nuclear Energy

According to WHO (World Health Organisation), those fossil fuel power plant killed far more many people every year compared to nuclear power plant in 20 years. Bangladesh alone is 50k to 200k/year, no wonder they went for nuclear power plant now, cheaper and safer. TB, asthma etc originated from those fossil fuel power plants. And that, those fossil fuel powered plant operates in normal mode, what if it blows up? 

Germany have been the biggest builders and investors in Nuclear energy, practically they are the pioneer. There are almost 160 reactors are being planned and proposed in China alone. And Germany is building at least half of those that’s in China only. Maybe in Malaysia, if we choose to build a nuclear power plant, it might be build by the German. That’ how it is.

It was the Germans that basically introduce Nuclear Energy. In 1939, they formed Uranverein (Uranium Club). Who are these guys? Kurt Diebner, Abraham Esau, Walther Gerlach, Erich Schumann, Albert Einstein, Walther Bothe, Klaus Clusius, Otto Hahn, Paul Harteck, Werner Heisenberg and many more. These guys are the fathers of nuclear technology all of them are Germans. Either Americans, Chinese or even Russia, they have German Physicists / scientists working or leading their nuclear technology. Germany has more nuclear scientists in whole of Europe and today nuclear have become a lucrative industry due to astronomical increase of fossil fuel plants. So you think Merkel seriously going to close shop??? HELL NO!!! She’s just saying it for the popularity to get votes and diverting economic crises that they having environmental issues, that’s all. Nowadays German scientists and companies are all over the world building and teaching about nuclear power plants to the world. That’s the reality and the fact about Germany Nuclear Energy.

European Union today they have almost similar power grids which each other and they share it among each other with similar pricing in EURO. Like making Airbus making their plane each components came from each different states in European Union. Same as Power Plants, France and Russia supply power almost all to EU states, France have 58 and Russia have 32. And the whole of EU they got 195!! And they are building at least 19 every year. And who’s the biggest investors in EU nuclear?? It still Germany!! They just close 7 old ones but they still have 17. And they are not behind Germany backyard? Those nuclear plants in France are just a few kilometers away from Germany. Merkel just saying it for popularity, election is coming but her action is otherwise. That’s the fact about EU.

Do you seriously think Chancellor Merkel of Germany is sincere enough to CLOSE SHOP their nuclear power technology??? Why don’t she close the NEW Nuclear Power Plant build by Germany, why she close only the already DUE to be shutdown only? Do you know that the best Universities to learn nuclear power technology are in Germany? Do you know that US MIT Techonology University only provides scholarship to anyone who learns nuclear tech in Germany, France and Japan only? (MIT CANES is Center for Advanced Nuclear Energy Systems Scholarship) Why Merkel didn’t shut down the University? If Merkell is sincere to close shop their nuclear technology in Germany, why don’t she shutdown all the German investors and power corporations that have been advising, designing, building the nuclear power plants around the world today that have brought money back to German economy? If Merkel sincere to shutdown Nuclear Tech, is she willing to "erase" that the founders of Nuclear Tech is Germans scientists and willing to "erase" all their work? Think again YL Chew. She ain’t sincere. She’s just diverting the bad economy panic issues in Germany to environmental issues, that’s all.

Germany actually disbanding those nuclear power plants in the south because it is old, and actually Germany buying nuclear power source from France and Czech, those 2 countries have more than 50 nuclear plants and they over supplied so Germany buy from them without investing in new ones. France and the Czech Republic are feeding in nuclear power into southern Germany now that older German nuclear power plants have been shut down.

Andree Bohling, Greenpeace energy expert said ;

"It is not true that Germany would not have enough of its own capacity with the shutdown old nuclear power plants. The increased imports can be explained by the reaction of the electricity markets, who still continue to supply with the cheaper electricity – and it can at times come increasingly from nuclear plants in in France”.

Therefore YL Chew, enough said, let’s go nuclear.

Comparing Energy Costs of Nuclear with other Sources

Lynas incident : Since this PKR woman said no to nuke, so we going back with high cost, high pollution, short term life cycle, fossil fuel power station now? With the unstable price of coal, natural gas or oil and the back dated technology will cost us more impact.

There are reasons that US, UK, EU and even Japan still push ahead with nuclear power plants. They have made comparisons between fossil fuel power station and nuclear and the results made them willing to take the risks. Check here, here, and here.


And for those dumbazz PKR that complaint about the nuke power plant, this is the comparison of cost of Electricity Production for every kilowatt hour in 2010 (latest) ;

Nuclear - USD 0.04/kwh,

Hydro - USD 0.03/kwh,

Coal USD 0.045/kwh (depend on transportation distance),

Natural Gas - USD 0.10/kwh,

Petroleum - USD 0.10/kwh,

Other renewables - USD 0.15/kwh

Therefore, with more uncertainties on the fossil resources in the near future, nuclear should be a go ahead.

Ask yourself, why in Fukushima, they still continue building more nuclear power plants even they got that incident, why don’t they change to fossil fuel if nuclear not safe? Of course Japan is struggling with their crisis, their reactors were hit with a bloody tsunami!!! Any type of power plant blows up or got hit by tsunami will create crises. If nuclear will create radiation crises, the fossil fuel power plant will create poisonous air crises. Both types still kills ya if blows up, so the question is, which kills less? That’s the point. Ask yourself, why in Fukushima, they still continue building more nuclear power plants even they got that incident? Why don’t they change to fossil fuel if nuclear not safer and cheaper? Japanese are not dumb.

And by the way if you guys don’t know, coal ash is more radioactive than nuclear waste. By burning away all the pesky carbon and other impurities, coal power plants produce heaps of radiation. One of the cleanest energy and cheapest is nuclear. The risks are the meltdown which results from human errors, if we have tight safety measures, everything will be fine. Oh wait, Japan is building more nuke plants increasing their megawatt capacity to 30%. These PKR people that made complaint are bunch of idiots (Oh wait, I forgot, they are idiots no wonder in Selangor there’s negative GDP).

If these guys want to complain, they should have come with solutions to address the issues of Electricity Generation we having today. Like outdated technology of power plants, the daily pollution generated daily from fossil fuel power plants, the unstable fluctuations of coal, natural gas or oil etc. Just making complaint and then walk away is just talking cock.

Bukti Australia juga ada Rare Earth (Nadir Bumi)

Puak2 anti LYNAS dok kata kerajaan Australia tak benarkan sisa rare earth (nadir bumi) disimpan di negara mereka sebab bahaya. Ok takpa. Ini, 35 km di selatan Laverton, barat Australia ni kemende?? Jamban? Mount Weld satu kawasan setempat yang paling kaya rare earth di dunia iaitu setakat ini telah digali 773,300 ton mineral. Laverton ini hanya 17 km dari Melbourne, salah satu bandar utama di Australia. Apa cerita ni? Saintis anti Lynas mana dok temberang ni? Bak kata pepatah Che Rosli pakar nuklear PAS, "SAYA PUN MALU".

 Mount Weld, the richest known deposit of Rare Earths in the world

Mount Weld

Mount Weld is located 35 kilometres south of Laverton, Western Australia. The initial mining campaign was successfully completed in June 2008 and was accomplished lost-time-injury free, on budget and ahead of schedule.

The campaign mined 773,300 tonnes of ore, with an average grade of 15.4% Rare Earths Oxide (REO).

The ore is stockpiled on-site according to grade and mineralogy. The Run-Of-Mine (ROM) pad has sufficient ore for more than two years of downstream processing operation.

During the campaign, approximately two million bulk cubic metres of overburden was mined, which has been placed on overburden stockpiles. Rehabilitation of the overburden stockpiles with top soil and revegetation has commenced.

(Refer here)

Meh kita tengok gambar kilang LYNAS kat Australia ini yang kononnya puak2 ANTI LYNAS dok kata tak wujud atau tutup kat Australia sebab kerajaan Australia tak benarkan kononnya bahaya. Gambar struktur kilang sama ja macam kat Malaysia. Pada tahun lepas bulan December 2011, kilang ini dah berjaya meningkatkan produksi sehingga 15 dry ton setiap jam, wow! Aku konfius kalau LYNAS dikatakan terlalu bahaya di Australia sebab radiasi kononnya, tapi apasal LYNAS Australia terus tingkatkan produksi dan operasi seperti biasa tanpa halangan?? Jeng Jeng Jeng, ada pakar saintis anti lynas kat sini boleh jawab??

 Floatation Section viewed from Ball Mill area at the Concentration Plant

Concentration Plant

Following the commissioning of the Concentration Plant in May 2011, the plant continued to ramp up and is performing ahead of expectations.

The Concentration Plant continues to ramp up, with nameplate throughput of 15 dry tonnes per hour being reached frequently during the month of December 2011.  In the same month, REO recoveries was 71.7%against a planned 65% recovery rate.  At the end of Q4 2011, 6,059 dry metric tonnes of concentrate containing 2,188 tonnes of REO were bagged on site, ready to be transported.

(Refer here)

 Pictures are from - Lynas Corp.com